Archive

Tag Archives: gardening

Ok, I have to take a quick break from work to post this picture.  I planted this rosebush a month or so ago but it’s just now blooming.  The stem of this rose must have grown two or three inches a day when I was initially planting and watering it which was incredible, but not as impressive as the size of the bud which contained this beautiful flower:

It’s a Lady Bird Johnson Rose.  I think Lady Bird has a couple of tulip cultivars named after her (they’re perpetually in the White House’s garden) and in the past couple of years some folks named a rose after her as well.  I bought it on a whim when I went to Breed & Co. at the beginning of spring.  The picture, as you might expect, doesn’t do any justice whatsoever to the flower itself, which is about the size of my fist and much richer in color.

P.S. I’m fine with caterpillars munching on my plants if butterflies stay around, but I think I’ve got an aphid problem too.  A few weeks ago I noticed a few lady bug larvae running around maintaining my garden for me, but apparently they’ve moved on to gardens richer in aphids.  I wish they’d come back.  Those aphids better enjoy the next few days while I’m on the inside doing my writing because after that it’s going to be a horticultural shock and awe campaign.

It seems I’ve spent the last week experiencing half-posts; there are a lot of observations I might try to force into a full piece, but those never work out.  Instead, I’m going to go with bullet points.

  • The Pixies. I think I’ve listened to Doolittle at least a half dozen times in the past week, partly because I watched the documentary loudQUIETloud on Hulu.  It’s not the best documentary, but it does present some of the dynamics of one of the most important bands of the late 80s/early 90s on their reunion tour.  Their music is as weird and split-personalitied as the band members are;  it’s allegedly depressing but it’s so catchy that I move right past it and have a good time.  David Lovering, the drummer, has to be one of the most underrated of that group.  I’d put him in a top 5 with Topper Headon and John Bonham as one of those drummers whose abilities destroy any limits that might be placed on the songwriters.
  • Garden Update. I added two lavender plants, another mint plant, two aloes, and a Lady Bird Johnson rose bush.  I also built a rough compost pile, although next summer I’d like to replace it with something a little bit more efficient.  I don’t know how effective turning a giant heap will be, but I’ve got one.
  • SXSW. It’s Spring Break and SXSW in Austin.  Tomorrow I’m heading down to Hotel San Jose at noon to sell some new shirts from Sanctuary Printshop, but be on the lookout for our fully modified ’79 El Camino cruising the streets and printing posters on site.  Downtown needs a quadruple bypass during SXSW so I’m prepping the Brava tonight for some serious street action.
  • Latin. I’ve been teaching myself Latin with L.A. Wilding’s Latin Course for Schools, which I hadn’t heard of before I purchased it.  I’m just starting the Second Conjugation and Second Declension, and I’m really enjoying the material.  The lessons are strictly grammar and vocabulary followed by Latin-to-English and English-to-Latin translation exercises.  All languages should be taught this way – I haven’t learned to count or name objects in my bathroom yet, and so I’m actually interested in continuing the study.  Besides, who wouldn’t want to study the book of someone with this academic title: “L.A. Wilding, M.A.  Senior Classical Master, Dragon School, Oxford.  Formerly Scholar of Oriel College, Oxford.”  Loeb Classical Library, here I come!
  • Two new books. I received Rémi Brague’s The Legend of the Middle Ages: Philosophical Explorations of Medieval Christianity, Judaism, and Islam and Heiko A. Oberman’s The Dawn of the Reformation.  Thanks to Wedgewords for the suggestions.  I’ve already read the preface and first essay in Oberman’s text and I can’t wait to work through more of it.  There are a pair of great quotations worth sharing:
  • “Each of these articles [in the book] testifies to the need and value of placing the Reformation movement in its medieval context and bridging the ideological gaps between late medieval, Renaissance, and Reformation studies.”
  • “The legitimation for turning [to big picture narratives] nevertheless — from time to time — to such a comprehensive theme lies rather in the need to counterbalance the atomizing tendencies of our specialized inquiries, which afford a scholarly shelter against critique while obscuring the coordinates and shape of the puzzle.”

I knew medievalists got to claim the Renaissance, but I hadn’t thought yet that medievalists would get to claim the Reformation as well.  Quite exciting.

I’ve been thinking lately about the relationship between philosophy and history, and receiving the Brague and Oberman books only made me think about that tension even more.  Brague, Oberman, and earlier scholars like Etienne Gilson exemplify great historians whose works are crucial for philosophers (and almost raise them to that level themeselves).  Other historians, like Michel Foucault and other researchers who distill their method from Nietzsche, preach the end (or perhaps the irrelevance) of philosophy.  My experience has been that more of the latter category exist currently, while the former are the ones who inspire me to keep reading.  More reflections on that topic might be coming soon.

Although I doubt our real grandmothers are trying to speak like surfers or pothead musicians, No. 65 does have a great deal of truth to it.  It came on the inside of a bottle cap of a Mint & Honey Sweet Leaf Tea that I just opened.  I bought the bottle on a whim before a good three hours worth of weeding that I just finished.  No kidding.  And considering that the crown jewel of my garden is one little English mint plant, the meaning of my day is more layered at 2:30 in the afternoon than most days ever get.

But when you spend three hours pulling weeds, cutting weeds, yanking up bamboo roots, and taking apart that unnecessary fencing that’s been there since you moved in as a leftover from the crazy landlord prior to the current crazy one, you get to thinking.  You might think that gardening is where manliness meets gentility, which is, of course, true.  Or perhaps if the Rev. Bill Boyd is your pastor, and you first came to his church when he wouldn’t shut up about gardening, when he was basically suggesting that if you weren’t a gardener you aren’t a good Christian, you get to thinking and theologizing.

Weeding and repentance have a number of things in common.  A number of them are obvious, like how no one wants to do it, or they weed or repent out of guilt, or they weed or repent because they have to keep up appearances with the neighbors, etc.  But there are a few more observations worth making.

Just as weeding is dirtier than ignoring your yard and garden, repentance is dirtier than sin (although it’s not cosmically dirtier).  We can’t expect that the act of repentance, which takes us from one spiritual level to another, is going to be clean on the inside or the outside.  In the first stage of repentance we acknowledge our own dirtiness before God.  We recognize our sin and admit to ourselves that we are overrun and unmanageable.  But repentance, at its core, doesn’t involve imagining a future better life, but is instead a turning towards God who will be the author of that life.  This is perhaps the grittiest, dirtiest spiritual movement one can ever make.  And, just like weeding, we need to make that movement a habit.

Weeding is not best understood as destruction or elimination, but rather as the first step in the process of cultivation.  In light of the gospel and the indwelling of the Spirit, we don’t repent to simply level out to neutral.  Weeding is best done, and most enthusiastically done, in preparation for the planting of a spring garden.  Weeding has an objective.  Good weeding has a telos toward which its action is oriented.

It’s a sly form of legalism that tempts us not to participate in the hard work of cultivating ourselves.  In fears of legalism, some evangelicals shy away from anything that looks like work directed at the self.  When that happens, legalism and antinomianism have both won.  Such a Christian believes his scale is evened out and would turn grace into a new and twisted law, which, having had its effect, nullifies any call to action.  Just like legalism cuts out the heart of the law which outlines the need of a Redeemer, this grace-legalism cuts out the opportunity to participate in our own redemption.  This opportunity could be called the hands of grace, as Paul writes in Eph. 2:10:

For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

Next Saturday I’m going to be out in my yard again, weeding and mowing.  I can’t decide if I want to plant a flower garden or plant tomatoes for a fried green feast in the summer, so leave your vote in the comment section.  Be warned though; this isn’t an election.  It’s a bill you’re voting on, and I’m the president.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.